麻豆果冻传媒

Students Protest Standardized Tests

Updated
|
Students Protest Standardized Tests
With the standardized test season approaching, we look at recent protests of the tests by some students and school districts.

鈥楾is the season for standardized testing at public schools across the country, as school districts gear up for statewide testing that provides a glimpse into how and what students are learning. The season is not typically met with happy anticipation by most students and teachers; in fact, the mood may better be described as anxiety and even trepidation. In a few areas of the nation, students and teachers are taking matters into their own hands, organizing boycotts of tests that some say are a waste of valuable instruction hours and inaccurate gauge of how well schools are teaching and students are learning.

Portland Opts Out

With the (OAKS) examinations looming in Portland, some students have decided that enough is enough when it comes to the statewide testing process. Members of the Portland Student Union have launched an opt-out campaign to protest the examinations with a district-wide boycott by students. According to , members of the student union are encouraging other students to boycott the examinations, by opting out on test days.

This video reports the situation with Portland students protesting standardized tests.

The reports that ideas of the boycott began to circulate when two different Portland Student Unions got together and realized they shared a common concern involving the state examinations. The students involved in the unions began educating themselves on the impact a boycott of the testing might have on the schools involved. The students also familiarized themselves with the opt-out process, in order to let other students know how to officially remove themselves from the standardized tests.

鈥淲e are choosing to opt-out of the OAKS tests as they are tests that directly waste class time, and are used as a form of evaluation of our schools,鈥 the group organizing the opt-out was quoted as saying in U.S. News. The group compared OAKS to other standardized testing that provided the same purpose for assessing student learning, but also provided benefits to students, such as college entrance examinations. The group stated, 鈥淭hese tests are beneficial to students in comparison to the OAKS test that literally has zero benefit to students.鈥

State Testing Requirements

According to , the state mandates testing for students every year from third grade through eighth grade. The state also tests students in 11th grade, and scores from those exams are used to test student proficiency for graduation from high school. The only exemptions allowed for opt-outs currently include religious or disability-related to reasons. Opt-outs require a parent鈥檚 written authorization.

With standardized testing currently used in Oregon as a means of assessing proficiency prior to graduation, some students, parents, and teachers have expressed concern that a widespread boycott of the tests could impact the ability of some students to graduate from high school on time. However, the student union asserts that there are many other ways for students to demonstrate proficiency in core subjects, including Advanced Placement examinations and college exams like the ACT and SAT. Because science is not a requirement for graduation in Oregon, students would also not need standardized testing in this area to meet graduation proficiency.

Portland Follows on Heels of Seattle Boycott

Portland schools are not the first to propose a boycott of standardized testing this year. U.S. News also reports that teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle recently announced they would not be administering Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) testing to their students this year. The boycott was voted on unanimously by teachers at the school, who claim the tests are wasting valuable class time, as well as staffing resources and money.

Here is a report on the Seattle situation.

鈥淲e at Garfield are not against accountability or demonstrating student progress,鈥 Garfield teacher Jesse Hagopian was quoted as saying at U.S. News. 鈥淲e do insist on a form of assessment relevant to what we鈥檙e teaching in the classroom. Some of my colleagues would propose replacing the MAP with a test that is aligned to our curriculum.鈥

MAP testing is done multiple times throughout the year, in order for teachers to gauge the academic progress of students. While these exams are not the state-mandated, high-stakes testing that is getting the attention in Portland, the teachers could face disciplinary action from the school district for their boycott. However, the teachers have garnered extensive support from students, parents, and educators in Seattle and across the country.

The Need for Testing

While many complain about the state of standardized testing today, others argue that while the system is far from perfect, it is better than no assessment of school and student performance whatsoever. Portland Public Schools recently posted a blog on their website titled, 鈥淪tandardized Tests are a Key Learning Tool.鈥 The article points out that the OAKS tests show how well students have learned what they need to in each core subject and how well Portland schools are addressing the needs of students.

The blog also makes note of the importance of the OAKS exams because they are an effective way to objectively measure standards across multiple schools. The OAKS tests are just one tool teachers use to assess how well students are learning the subject material.

In this video, John Oliver explains the issue of standardized tests.

The article also seems to draw a line in the sand for students contemplating participation in the proposed boycott. The website warns that students are required by law to take the examinations unless they qualify for an exemption. It also reminds students that they must have parental permission to opt-out of examinations.

With the battle lines drawn, it is now anybody鈥檚 guess whether students will follow through with their boycott, and what schools will do if the boycott results in the impact students are hoping for.

Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview

Additional Resources [+]

麻豆果冻传媒 Articles

Drug Testing Teachers: Testing Positive or Negative?
Drug Testing Teachers: Testing Positive or Negative?
This article examines the ongoing debate about drug testing for teachers in public schools. It discusses the rationale behind such policies, privacy concerns, cost implications, and the relatively low prevalence of drug use among educators. The piece also explores future considerations for drug testing policies in educational settings.
Head in the Clouds: Why Public Schools are Embracing Cloud Computing
Head in the Clouds: Why Public Schools are Embracing Cloud Computing
Explore how public schools are integrating cloud computing into their educational frameworks. Understand the advantages such as enhanced collaboration, cost savings, and accessibility, as well as the challenges schools face in adopting this technology.
Understanding Rubrics
September 27, 2024
Understanding Rubrics
This article explores the fundamental principles of rubrics in education, focusing on their role as assessment tools. It breaks down the key components of rubrics, including criteria, performance levels, and descriptors. The piece also delves into the two main types of rubrics - holistic and analytic - providing authoritative definitions and explaining their unique applications in educational settings.

Public School Policies

EDUCATION REFORM
Education reform is in the works, and you can stay updated on the latest changes, debates, and policies here. Learn more about No Child Left Behind and how it impacts your child. Explore how federal and state government is working to improve school performance, student achievement and education standards.
More Articles
Read more articles (18)
Teachers and Unions (10) Public School Budgets (13) Vouchers (3) School Discipline Policies (16) School Controversies (47)