Utah may boast the most restrictive sexual education laws in the country if a new bill passed through the state legislature is signed into law. The new law would restrict schools from teaching any type of sex ed in public schools outside of abstinence and would prohibit discussion on contraception and sexually transmitted diseases. Despite the fact that this bill has passed in both the state House and Senate, there is plenty of opposition to the bill with state lawmakers, educators, and even parents.
About the Bill
Referred to as HB363 and sponsored by Bill Wright (R-Holden), this bill would define sex education in the state of Utah as abstinence-only and would ban schools from providing instruction on sexual intercourse, homosexuality, contraceptive methods, and sexually transmitted diseases. According to , Wright sponsored the bill as a response to what he called 鈥渋nappropriate material鈥 presented in classrooms. Specifically, Wright was opposed to material produced by Planned Parenthood being distributed to students. Wright said he believes sex education is something that should take place in the home, rather than the school.
Currently, Utah schools are allowed to offer sex-education courses with some restrictions attached. Schools are allowed to provide instruction about sexual intercourse and contraception without advocating for it. The classes are offered on an elective basis, so parents can choose not to have children take the course if they don鈥檛 want them to.
鈥淎 lot of our schools are already teaching abstinence,鈥 Wright told Deseret News. 鈥淭his will help us set a path in the future where our curriculum doesn鈥檛 get highjacked.鈥
According to , 37 states in the U.S. require abstinence to be taught as a part of their sex-ed curriculum. Out of those states, 26 require that schools teach abstinence as the only sure way to prevent pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases. If this law passes in Utah as it is currently written, it would become the most restrictive sex-education policy in the country.
鈥淯tah is by far the most restrictive policy out there,鈥 Rebecca Wind, spokesperson for the Guttmacher Institute, which tracks reproductive policy, told the . 鈥淭here are no other states that鈥on鈥檛 allow birth control discussion at all, in the way that the Utah legislation does. So it is unique in that respect.鈥
This video examines sex education programs in Utah schools.
Those in Favor of HB363
In a state legislature that is predominantly Republican, HB363 has received plenty of positive responses. Many agree with Wright that the place to educate children about such private matters is in the home, not the public school environment.
鈥淭o replace the parent in the school setting, among people who we have no idea what their morals are, we have no ideas what their values are, yet we turn our children over to them to instruct them in the most sensitive sexual activities in their lives,鈥 Republican state Sen. Stuart Reid told The Slatest.
Sen. Mark Madsen (R-Lehi) agreed with Reid. Madsen and told Deseret News that the system is wrong if parents are sending kids to school to learn about sex and schools are sending kids home to learn how to read. He stated that it is important to define the roles both parents and schools play in the education of a child. Several other Republican senators agreed with Wright, Reid, and Madsen, stating that matters this personal should be discussed with parents, rather than those outside the student鈥檚 family.
This video reports on the bill the Utah state legislature proposed passing restricting sex education.
Opposition to the Bill
While many were in favor of the bill 鈥 enough to pass it through both the House and Senate 鈥 others felt the step went too far in restricting the education of Utah youth. While the support of the bill fell primarily along party lines, a handful of Republican senators sided with the Democrats on the issue. One senator who had qualms about the bill was Sen. Peter Knudson (R-Brigham City), who agreed that a bill to encourage abstinence was ideal, but not very realistic.
鈥淵ou can鈥檛 just pull the covers over your head and say 鈥榓bstinence-only!鈥 And think that鈥檚 going to do it,鈥 Knudson told the Daily Herald. 鈥淭hat isn鈥檛 going to do it.鈥
Knudson explained to the Daily Herald that he was concerned some parents wouldn鈥檛 feel comfortable or qualified to talk to their children about sex. Knudson, a dentist, said that while he did have the 鈥渟ex talks鈥 with his kids, it was not a comfortable thing to do.
鈥淚 think to myself with the education that I have had, I have some hesitancies about parents who have had no education in these areas,鈥 Knudson said.
The Chicago Tribune reports that numerous Democrats in the House and Senate voiced concern over whether parents would offer sufficient instruction to their children in these matters. Some were worried that a lack of sex education in schools could increase the rate of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The Tribune cited a study published recently in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine that showed states with more comprehensive sex education programs had lower teen birth rates. However, those figures appeared to be offset by other variables, including race, income levels, and religion.
Now that the bill has passed both the House and Senate in the state, the next step would be the desk of Republican Governor Gary Herbert. While many expect Herbert to officially sign the bill into law 鈥 he has expressed his support for the bill already 鈥 the governor鈥檚 office has not yet made an official statement as to Governor Herbert鈥檚 intent. Because there were revisions to the bill during the legislative process, the governor will need to review the bill once again before he makes his final decision.
Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview
