Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School serves 15 students in grades 3-12.
The percentage of students achieving proficiency in math was ≤20% (which was lower than the Louisiana state average of 66%). The percentage of students achieving proficiency in reading/language arts was ≤20% (which was lower than the Louisiana state average of 66%).
The student:teacher ratio of 5:1 was lower than the Louisiana state level of 17:1.
Minority enrollment was 60% of the student body (majority Black), which was higher than the Louisiana state average of 58% (majority Black).
What percent of students have achieved state testing proficiency in math and reading?
≤20% of students have achieved math proficiency (compared to the 66% LA state average), while ≤20% of students have achieved reading proficiency (compared to the 66% LA state average).
What is the graduation rate of Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School?
The graduation rate of Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School is 50%, which is lower than the Louisiana state average of 76%.
How many students attend Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School?
15 students attend Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School.
What is the racial composition of the student body?
53% of Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School students are Black, 40% of students are White, and 7% of students are American Indian.
What is the student:teacher ratio of Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School?
Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School has a student ration of 5:1, which is lower than the Louisiana state average of 17:1.
What grades does Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School offer ?
Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School offers enrollment in grades 3-12
What school district is Juvenile Detention Center Alternative School part of?
The article discusses a proposal in Washington D.C. to make college applications a requirement for high school graduation. It examines the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a policy, including its impact on graduation rates and college attendance. The piece also considers similar initiatives in other states and the debate surrounding this approach
This piece explores the controversial practice of offering monetary rewards to students for good grades. It examines studies conducted in various cities, discussing the effectiveness of such programs and the ethical concerns they raise. The article presents arguments from both supporters and critics of this approach to student motivation.
This article explores the fundamental principles of rubrics in education, focusing on their role as assessment tools. It breaks down the key components of rubrics, including criteria, performance levels, and descriptors. The piece also delves into the two main types of rubrics - holistic and analytic - providing authoritative definitions and explaining their unique applications in educational settings.
