Could your child鈥檚 public school be playing 鈥渂ig brother鈥 to its students? For some students, their schools just may be spying on them 鈥 even in the comfort and privacy of their own homes.
In February, a Pennsylvania Court faced a case where a public school was accused of spying on students via the webcams attached to school-issued laptops.
According to the initial complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the Lower Merion School District used remotely activated webcams on school-issued laptops to spy on students鈥 home activities. As reports, the lawsuit claims that Blake J. Robbins, a student at Harriton Senior High School, became aware of the spying in November 2009, when an assistant principal told Robbins that he had been caught via the webcam engaging in 鈥渋mproper behavior鈥 in his home.
This video reports the story referred to above.
It is yet unknown what the boy was doing in his bedroom or whether he received disciplinary action from the school. Nevertheless, the case is receiving widespread national attention and prompted nationwide concerns from students and parents.
The School District鈥檚 Response
Webcams Used Only for Locating Missing Laptops
The school district has issued admitting that spyware was installed on the laptops that the schools issued to students but maintaining that the feature 鈥渨as only used for the narrow purpose of locating a lost, stolen or missing laptop.鈥
According to the Washington Post, Doug Young, a spokesperson for the Lower Merion School District, says that the district remotely activated 42 webcams to find missing student laptops over the past 14 months. The district had issued about 2,300 laptops to students in total, and Young reported that the district had recovered 28 of the missing laptops.
Parents Were Not Told about the Webcams
However, those concerned with privacy issues still find the case alarming because the school district did not clarify to students and families that the laptops they were being issued contained software that could be used for spying or surveillance.
Doug Young, a spokesman for the Lower Merion School District, acknowledged to the Associated Press that the school district鈥檚 failure to explain the built-in security feature was a mistake, and he noted that such mistakes may be expected when schools launch innovative programs that combine technology with education. The Washington Post quotes Young saying, 鈥淎nytime you're talking about technology and education and kids, there's an important conversation to be had about privacy and balance.鈥
But Young added that the school district 鈥渃an categorically state that we have always been committed to protecting the privacy of our students.鈥
The school district has deactivated the security feature since the lawsuit was filed.
This video discusses the various ways we can be spied on.
The Public鈥檚 Response
The case has brought to light potential conflicts between technology and privacy that are important to students and parents everywhere.
Invasion of Privacy and Violation of Federal Wire-Tapping Laws
Kevin Bankston, a senior staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation specializing in electronic privacy, told CNN that the school district鈥檚 actions were 鈥渇oolish and dangerous鈥 and may have broken federal wire-tapping laws. He said that the case might serve as a warning to other school districts.
Meanwhile, American Civil Liberties Union director Vic Walczak said that 鈥渢he school district's clandestine electronic eavesdropping violates constitutional privacy rights, intrudes on parents' right to raise their children and may even be criminal under state and federal wiretapping laws.鈥
Cory Doctorow, a journalist and science fiction author who has addressed privacy and technology issues in novels such as Little Brother, writes on the BoingBoing website, "If true, these allegations are about as creepy as they come.鈥
How Much Surveillance is Necessary?
Although the general public reaction since the lawsuit was filed has been one of shock and outrage, some in the computer monitoring business are pointing out that surveillance of school-issued computers may be necessary to an extent.
Doug Taylor, director of educational marketing for Spectorsoft, which sells PC and Internet monitoring software, said to that monitoring students鈥 Internet and computer activities is 鈥渧ital鈥 to ensure that students are not using machines in an 鈥渋nappropriate manner鈥 by downloading copyrighted material, engaging in cyberbullying, or downloading potential malware.
As the case makes its way to trial, this question regarding whether schools have the right to monitor the activities of students who use school-issued computers will likely be hotly debated.
Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview
#publicschools #webcamspying
